Students Scammed?
  San Diego, California – An investigation conducted by Special Investigations Agency, a non profit organization, supports the allegations of unfair and deceptive business practices as asserted by former and current students and former employees of a for profit vocational college. We are unable to release the name of the institution due to a settlement agreement allowing for the victims to recover their loss as expeditiously as possible. As a result, legal action was planned under the California Unfair Practices Act seeking a court order stopping unfair and deceptive recruiting techniques and seeking restitution for victims.
   
  A number of former students had reported to SIA that they were pressured with unethical sales tactics into signing up to attend the school. In one case, the same day the student walked into sign up, he was placed into a class that was already in progress on its third week of classes.
   
  Many students said the assessment used by the school to evaluate whether they were qualified to meet the educational challenge, was an eight minute test of riddle type questions. One of the questions was as follows: If a butcher has two kids, one a boy and one a girl, what does he weigh? The answer was meat!
   
  Additionally, some reported that after dropping classes, The school continued to bill their Sallie Mae guaranteed student loan. One student, after allegedly attending only for five weeks, was billed almost $6,000.00 on his student loan even though he had withdrawn from the school after only attending ten days.
   
  SIA sent an undercover investigator into the school to pose as a prospective student and to get a firsthand look at the alleged sales pressure tactics. We were stunned to get a glimpse of exactly what the students had been alleging. The allegations were strikingly similar to what we experienced.
   
  After Channel Ten News aired this story, calls were received from current and former employees of the school supporting the allegations. To view the news story, click here. After meeting with local school officials, the school assured us that discussions were held with their sales staff regarding our concerns; however the school failed to resolve the issues with the student complainants. Instead of committing to reforms that would protect the public and prospective students, the school instead wishes to address individual student claims via private arbitration, away from public and judicial scrutiny.
   
 
   Copyright © 2005. Special Investigations Agency